commented on April 1, 2010 at 6:16 p.m.
now the real question is, who must compensate something. those with the cool company and the stylish businesscards, or those not part of the team, leaving weird comments... ;-)
commented on April 1, 2010 at 6:19 p.m.
My comment was certainly not meant as an attack :) Just a statement about the colors.
Never the less, the cards do look cool. I would have added your GPG signature for extra geekness (à la debian).
commented on April 1, 2010 at 7:44 p.m.
no worries pierre-luc, didn't refer to your comment. actually considered it informative.
commented on April 1, 2010 at 9 p.m.
AdminD: I kindly ask you to take a break, unless you want to receive a cease and desist letter.
commented on April 1, 2010 at 10:16 p.m.
You chose the name, I didn't. The analysis of parts of the name was offered by others. I assembled that information.
Get a thicker skin. Legal threats over things said in jest aren't cool and are certainly not conducive to winning favor or friends within the community.
commented on April 1, 2010 at 10:30 p.m.
AdminD: I didn't choose the company name, and you were really over the top. Don't forget it is a small company, there are people attached to it, and Google never forgets.
Actually it seriously hurts me that I had to censor your comments. Naïve as I am I always hoped for never being forced to use such measure. Heck, I even had to update this page template to really hide non public comments! The comment counter still is wrong.
Anyway, good that you calmed down. Let's be friends again.
commented on April 1, 2010 at 10:34 p.m.
AdminD: Actually its really just about the context. Face to face with you, in a bar or something we both would have had good fun with your comments. I'd surely have topped your jokes. Well, but a weblog isn't a private place.